The Saturn Astra, a rebadged Opel Astra, had a short but somewhat turbulent run in the US market. Introduced in 2008 and discontinued in 2009 due to Saturn's demise, figuring out which year is best – or least problematic – requires careful consideration. This guide provides a detailed look at the Astra's model years, helping you make an informed decision if you're considering purchasing one.
Saturn Astra: Model Year Comparison
| Feature/Concern | 2008 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Reliability | Generally considered slightly less reliable due to being the initial model year. More reported issues with the transmission, particularly the automatic. Some owners reported electrical glitches and minor fit and finish problems. Early production models had a higher likelihood of experiencing these issues. | Marginally improved reliability compared to 2008, although still not stellar. Some transmission issues persisted, but were less frequent. Fit and finish issues were reportedly reduced. Benefits from lessons learned during the 2008 production run. |
| Transmission Issues | Significant issues reported, especially with the 4-speed automatic transmission. Complaints included harsh shifting, slipping, and complete failure. Manual transmission was more reliable but still had some reported clutch problems. Valve body issues were a common culprit in automatic transmission failures. | Improved, but still present. Some owners reported similar issues to the 2008 model, although generally less frequently. Software updates were sometimes available to address shifting problems. Manual transmission continued to be more reliable than the automatic. |
| Electrical Problems | Reports of various electrical glitches, including issues with the radio, power windows, and central locking. Some owners experienced problems with the engine management system. Faulty wiring harnesses were sometimes identified as the cause. | Fewer reports of electrical problems compared to 2008. Some minor glitches still occurred, but were less widespread. Improved wiring harness quality may have contributed to the reduction in electrical issues. |
| Fit and Finish | Some complaints about interior trim pieces not fitting properly, rattles, and squeaks. Paint quality was generally considered adequate, but some owners reported premature fading or chipping. | Improved fit and finish compared to 2008. Fewer reports of rattles and squeaks. Minor improvements to interior materials and assembly quality. Paint quality remained similar to 2008. |
| Parts Availability & Support | Becoming increasingly challenging. Saturn's demise means parts are often sourced from Opel or aftermarket suppliers. Specific trim pieces and interior components can be difficult to find. | Same as 2008. Parts availability remains a significant concern. Reliance on Opel parts and the aftermarket is necessary. Finding qualified mechanics familiar with the Astra can also be difficult. |
| Recalls | Subject to a few recalls, primarily related to safety issues like airbag deployment and fuel system components. Check the NHTSA website for specific recall information related to the VIN. | May share some recalls with the 2008 model. Check the NHTSA website for specific recall information related to the VIN. Addressing any outstanding recalls is crucial before purchasing. |
| Fuel Economy | Acceptable for its class. Around 24 MPG city and 32 MPG highway with the automatic transmission. The manual transmission offered slightly better fuel economy. | Similar to 2008. Fuel economy remained relatively consistent across both model years. Driving style significantly impacts real-world fuel consumption. Regular maintenance is essential for maintaining optimal fuel efficiency. |
| Resale Value | Low due to Saturn's demise and the car's limited production run. Condition and mileage are the primary factors determining value. Expect to pay significantly less than comparable vehicles from other brands. | Similar to 2008. Low resale value continues to be a factor. The Astra is often viewed as a budget-friendly option for those seeking a compact car. Negotiation is often possible due to the limited demand. |
| Trim Levels | XE, XR | XE, XR |
| Engine | 1.8L Inline-4 (138 hp) | 1.8L Inline-4 (138 hp) |
Detailed Explanations
Overall Reliability: The 2008 Saturn Astra, being the first model year, encountered more initial production issues. The 2009 model benefited from lessons learned, resulting in marginal improvements, though it still wasn't considered exceptionally reliable. Potential buyers should be prepared for maintenance and repairs.
Transmission Issues: The 4-speed automatic transmission in the 2008 Astra was prone to problems like harsh shifting, slipping, and failure. The 2009 model saw some improvement, but issues persisted. The manual transmission was generally more reliable in both years.
Electrical Problems: The 2008 Astra had reports of various electrical glitches affecting the radio, power windows, and engine management system. The 2009 model experienced fewer of these issues, suggesting improvements in wiring or component quality.
Fit and Finish: The 2008 Astra had complaints about interior trim fit and quality, leading to rattles and squeaks. The 2009 model saw improvements in this area, with fewer reports of such issues.
Parts Availability & Support: Due to Saturn's discontinuation, finding parts for the Astra can be challenging. Owners often rely on Opel parts or aftermarket suppliers. Finding mechanics familiar with the car can also be difficult.
Recalls: Both model years were subject to recalls, primarily related to safety issues. Potential buyers should check the NHTSA website with the VIN to ensure all recalls have been addressed.
Fuel Economy: Both model years offered acceptable fuel economy for their class. The automatic transmission achieved around 24 MPG city and 32 MPG highway. The manual transmission provided slightly better fuel efficiency.
Resale Value: Both model years have low resale value due to Saturn's demise and limited production. Condition and mileage are the main factors determining value.
Trim Levels: Both years offered the same trim levels: XE and XR. The XR offered more features.
Engine: Both model years used the same 1.8L Inline-4 engine producing 138 horsepower.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Saturn Astra year is the most reliable? The 2009 model is generally considered slightly more reliable than the 2008 model, due to minor improvements made after the first year of production. However, both years have potential issues.
Are Saturn Astra parts hard to find? Yes, parts availability can be challenging due to Saturn's discontinuation. Owners often rely on Opel parts or aftermarket suppliers.
What are the common problems with the Saturn Astra? Common issues include transmission problems (especially with the automatic), electrical glitches, and fit and finish concerns. Regular maintenance is crucial.
Is the Saturn Astra a good car? It can be a decent, inexpensive option if you're aware of its potential issues and are prepared for maintenance and repairs. However, newer, more reliable cars are often a better choice.
Should I buy a Saturn Astra with an automatic transmission? The manual transmission is generally more reliable. If considering an automatic, ensure it has been well-maintained and consider a pre-purchase inspection.
Conclusion
While the 2009 Saturn Astra offers slight improvements over the 2008 model, both years present potential reliability challenges. Thorough inspection and a willingness to address potential issues are critical for anyone considering purchasing a used Saturn Astra.