The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, affectionately known as the Evo, is a legend in the world of rally-bred performance cars. Its turbocharged engine, all-wheel-drive system, and razor-sharp handling made it a formidable competitor on the track and a highly desirable road car. However, not all Evo models are created equal. This guide will walk you through the best and worst years of the Lancer Evolution, helping you make an informed decision if you're looking to buy one or simply want to learn more about this iconic machine.
Evolution Legacy
The Evo's history is rich with motorsport pedigree. It's a car that was built to dominate rally stages, and that DNA is evident in every generation. Knowing the strengths and weaknesses of each generation is crucial for any enthusiast or potential buyer. So let's dive in!
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution: Model Year Overview
| Model Year | Key Features and Highlights | Potential Issues/Concerns |
|---|---|---|
| Evo IV (1996-1998) | AYC (Active Yaw Control), Improved chassis stiffness | AYC pump failures, Rust in some markets |
| Evo V (1998-1999) | Wider track, Brembo brakes, Improved engine cooling | Potential for rust, ECU tuning limitations |
| Evo VI (1999-2001) | Titanium turbine wheel (RS model), Improved cooling and aerodynamics | AYC pump failures, Rust in some markets |
| Evo VII (2001-2003) | Increased chassis rigidity, ACD (Active Center Differential) | Heavier than previous models, Interior quality |
| Evo VIII (2003-2005) | Available in US market, Aluminum roof, Improved turbocharger | AYC pump failures, Potential for high mileage examples |
| Evo IX (2005-2007) | MIVEC (Mitsubishi Innovative Valve timing Electronic Control system), Improved turbocharger | AYC pump failures, Potential for high mileage examples |
| Evo X (2008-2015) | SST (Sportronic Shift Transmission) option, Super All-Wheel Control (S-AWC) | SST transmission issues, High cost of ownership, Engine reliability concerns (4B11T) |
Detailed Explanations
Evo IV (1996-1998)
The Evo IV marked a significant step forward in the Evolution series. It introduced AYC (Active Yaw Control), a system that actively distributes torque between the rear wheels to improve handling. The chassis was also significantly stiffened compared to previous generations. However, a common issue with the Evo IV is AYC pump failures, and some markets experienced rust problems.
Evo V (1998-1999)
Building on the success of the Evo IV, the Evo V featured a wider track, which enhanced stability and cornering grip. It also came equipped with Brembo brakes, providing significantly improved stopping power. Improved engine cooling was another key upgrade. Potential drawbacks include the continued risk of rust and some ECU tuning limitations compared to later models.
Evo VI (1999-2001)
The Evo VI refined the formula even further. The RS model featured a titanium turbine wheel, which reduced turbo lag and improved engine response. Further improvements were made to cooling and aerodynamics. Like the Evo IV, the Evo VI can suffer from AYC pump failures and rust in certain climates.
Evo VII (2001-2003)
The Evo VII represented a departure from the previous generations, with a focus on increased chassis rigidity and the introduction of ACD (Active Center Differential). While the improved chassis made for better handling, the Evo VII was heavier than previous models, which slightly impacted its agility. The interior quality was also considered a weak point by some enthusiasts.
Evo VIII (2003-2005)
The Evo VIII marked the official arrival of the Lancer Evolution in the US market, which greatly increased its popularity and availability. Key features included an aluminum roof to lower the center of gravity and an improved turbocharger. However, potential buyers should be aware of the risk of AYC pump failures and the likelihood of finding high-mileage examples due to their age.
Evo IX (2005-2007)
Considered by many to be the pinnacle of the Lancer Evolution series, the Evo IX featured MIVEC (Mitsubishi Innovative Valve timing Electronic Control system), which improved engine efficiency and power delivery. It also boasted an improved turbocharger for enhanced performance. As with the Evo VIII, buyers should be mindful of AYC pump failures and the prevalence of high-mileage examples.
Evo X (2008-2015)
The Evo X was a significant departure from previous models. It offered a SST (Sportronic Shift Transmission) option, a dual-clutch automatic, and featured Super All-Wheel Control (S-AWC), a more advanced version of the all-wheel-drive system. However, the Evo X is known for SST transmission issues, a high cost of ownership, and engine reliability concerns (4B11T). The 4B11T engine, while powerful, is known to have issues with cracked cylinder walls and oil consumption, especially when heavily modified.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Evo is the most reliable?
The Evo IX is generally considered the most reliable due to its refined engine and relatively simple design compared to the Evo X.
Which Evo is the best for tuning?
The Evo VIII and IX are popular choices for tuning due to their robust engines and readily available aftermarket support.
What are the common problems with Evos?
Common problems include AYC pump failures, rust, and, in the case of the Evo X, SST transmission and engine issues.
Which Evo is the best value for money?
The Evo VIII offers a good balance of performance, availability, and price, making it a potentially good value option.
Why are Evos so popular?
Evos are popular due to their exceptional handling, powerful turbocharged engines, and rally-bred heritage.
Conclusion
Choosing the best year for a Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution depends on your individual needs and priorities. The Evo IX is often regarded as the pinnacle of the series, while the Evo VIII offers a compelling combination of performance and value. The Evo X, while technologically advanced, can be more problematic. Thorough research, a pre-purchase inspection, and awareness of potential issues are crucial when considering any Evo model.