The Best Years For Chrysler 200s And Some To Avoid

The Chrysler 200, produced from 2011 to 2017, aimed to revitalize Chrysler's mid-size sedan offerings. While it had moments of promise, especially with its sleek design and available features, the 200's lifespan was relatively short and marked by varying degrees of success. Understanding which model years delivered the best experience, and which to steer clear of, is crucial for anyone considering a used Chrysler 200.

Detailed Explanations

2011-2014 (First Generation)

The first generation Chrysler 200 was essentially a heavily revised Chrysler Sebring. While it benefited from a fresh exterior design and a more powerful V6 engine option, it still retained many of the Sebring's underlying issues. The 2011-2014 models are generally considered less desirable due to their below-average reliability, particularly concerning the automatic transmission. Interior materials felt cheap in many trims, and the older platform didn't offer the same level of safety as newer competitors. While affordable, the initial cost savings may be offset by higher maintenance and repair expenses.

Introduced as a rebadged Sebring: The first generation Chrysler 200 was introduced as a replacement for the Chrysler Sebring. Although it received significant styling updates and some mechanical improvements, it was built on the same platform as the Sebring, which had a history of reliability issues.

Improved styling: The Chrysler 200 featured a more modern and appealing exterior design compared to the Sebring it replaced. This included a revised front fascia, rear end, and overall body lines, giving it a more contemporary look.

Available V6 engine: The Chrysler 200 offered an optional 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 engine, which provided significantly more power and performance compared to the standard four-cylinder engine. This made the 200 a more appealing choice for buyers looking for a more engaging driving experience.

Generally more affordable: The first-generation Chrysler 200 was generally priced lower than many of its competitors in the mid-size sedan segment. This made it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.

Below-average reliability: The first-generation Chrysler 200 suffered from below-average reliability ratings, with common issues including transmission problems, electrical issues, and engine problems. This resulted in higher maintenance costs and more frequent repairs.

Transmission issues (especially early models): The automatic transmission in the first-generation Chrysler 200 was prone to problems, particularly in the early model years. These issues included rough shifting, slipping, and even complete transmission failure.

Interior quality concerns: The interior of the first-generation Chrysler 200 was criticized for its use of low-quality materials and lackluster design. The overall fit and finish were also subpar, detracting from the overall driving experience.

Safety concerns with older design: The first-generation Chrysler 200 was built on an older platform that did not offer the same level of safety as newer vehicles. It received lower safety ratings in some crash tests compared to its competitors.

2015-2017 (Second Generation)

The second-generation Chrysler 200 represented a significant leap forward in terms of design, technology, and available features. Its sleek, coupe-like styling was a major selling point. The 2015-2017 models offered better fuel economy (especially with the 4-cylinder engine) and the option of all-wheel drive, a rarity in the mid-size sedan segment. However, the complex 9-speed automatic transmission remained a source of problems, contributing to overall reliability concerns. While advanced safety features were available, they were often optional and not standard equipment. Rear seat headroom was also limited due to the sloping roofline. Ultimately, while aesthetically pleasing and technologically advanced, the second-generation 200 was plagued by reliability issues that prevent it from being a truly top-tier choice.

Completely redesigned: The second-generation Chrysler 200 featured a completely new design, both inside and out. This included a sleek and modern exterior, as well as a more upscale and refined interior.

Modern styling: The second-generation Chrysler 200 boasted a more modern and stylish exterior design, with a sleek coupe-like profile. This helped it stand out from its competitors in the mid-size sedan segment.

Available all-wheel drive: The second-generation Chrysler 200 was one of the few mid-size sedans to offer all-wheel drive. This made it a more appealing choice for buyers who lived in areas with inclement weather.

Improved fuel economy (with 4-cylinder): The second-generation Chrysler 200 offered improved fuel economy, particularly with the available 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine. This made it a more economical choice for buyers looking to save money on gas.

Advanced safety features (optional): The second-generation Chrysler 200 offered a range of advanced safety features, such as blind-spot monitoring, lane departure warning, and automatic emergency braking. However, these features were often optional and not standard equipment.

Complex 9-speed transmission issues: The second-generation Chrysler 200 was equipped with a 9-speed automatic transmission, which was prone to problems such as rough shifting, hesitation, and even complete failure. These issues were widely reported and contributed to the car's overall reliability problems.

Electrical problems: The second-generation Chrysler 200 also suffered from electrical problems, such as issues with the infotainment system, power windows, and door locks.

Build quality inconsistencies: The build quality of the second-generation Chrysler 200 was inconsistent, with some cars being well-built while others suffered from poor fit and finish.

Lower predicted reliability scores: The second-generation Chrysler 200 received lower predicted reliability scores from consumer organizations such as Consumer Reports. This reflected the car's history of reliability problems.

Limited rear headroom: The second-generation Chrysler 200's sleek roofline compromised rear headroom, making it less comfortable for taller passengers in the back seat.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which Chrysler 200 year is the most reliable? While none are exceptionally reliable, the 2016 and 2017 models of the second generation are generally considered slightly better than earlier years, though still not without potential issues.

What are the common problems with the Chrysler 200? Common issues include transmission problems (particularly with the 9-speed automatic), electrical problems, and build quality concerns.

Is the Chrysler 200 a good car to buy used? It depends on your budget and risk tolerance; if you are looking for a cheap car, it is an option, but its reliability scores are low, and problems could be costly.

What should I look for when buying a used Chrysler 200? Thoroughly inspect the transmission for smooth shifting, check for any electrical issues, and examine the interior and exterior for signs of poor build quality. Also, get a pre-purchase inspection from a trusted mechanic.

Are parts readily available for the Chrysler 200? Yes, parts are generally readily available due to the car's production run, although some specific parts for the 9-speed transmission may be harder to source.

Is the Chrysler 200 expensive to maintain? Due to its below-average reliability, the Chrysler 200 can be more expensive to maintain than some of its competitors.

Conclusion

While the Chrysler 200 offered attractive styling and some innovative features, its inconsistent reliability makes it a risky choice in the used car market. If you're considering a 200, proceed with caution, prioritize the 2016 and 2017 models, and ensure a thorough inspection before purchasing.