The Best Years For Acura Cl And Some To Avoid

The Acura CL, a sporty coupe produced by Honda's luxury division, aimed to offer a blend of style, performance, and reliability. Understanding the nuances of each model year is crucial for potential buyers seeking a dependable and enjoyable driving experience. This guide will delve into the best and worst years of the Acura CL, providing detailed insights to help you make an informed decision.

Acura CL: Model Year Overview

Detailed Explanations

1997-1999 (First Generation)

The first generation Acura CL, produced from 1997 to 1999, was a solid entry-level luxury coupe. It offered a comfortable ride and a well-appointed interior, making it a pleasant daily driver. The 2.2L (97-98) and 2.3L (98-99) four-cylinder engines were known for their reliability, and the available V6 provided adequate power. However, the styling was somewhat conservative for its time, and some early models experienced issues with the automatic transmission. These years represent a good value proposition if you're looking for a reliable and affordable used car.

Notable Strengths:

• Comfortable Ride: The first-generation CL prioritized comfort, making it suitable for long drives.
• Refined Interior: The interior was well-designed and featured quality materials for its class.
• Reliable Engine (Generally): Both the four-cylinder and V6 engines were known for their durability, but proper maintenance is key.

Potential Weaknesses:

• Automatic Transmission Issues (Early Models): Some early models, particularly the 1997 model year, experienced issues with the automatic transmission. Thorough inspection and a test drive are essential.
• Dated Styling: The styling of the first-generation CL might not appeal to everyone, as it lacks the aggressive lines of more modern coupes.

2001-2003 (Second Generation)

The second generation Acura CL, produced from 2001 to 2003, represented a significant upgrade over its predecessor. It featured a more aggressive and modern design, and the available 3.2L V6 engine in the Type-S model delivered impressive performance. The handling was also improved, making it a more engaging car to drive. However, the second-generation CL was plagued by widespread automatic transmission failures, especially in the 2001 and 2002 model years. This is the most significant factor to consider when evaluating this generation.

Notable Strengths:

• Powerful V6 Engine (Type-S): The 3.2L V6 in the Type-S model offered a significant performance boost, making it a fun car to drive.
• Sporty Handling: The second-generation CL had improved handling characteristics compared to the first generation.
• Updated Styling: The styling was more modern and aggressive, appealing to a wider range of buyers.

Potential Weaknesses:

• Automatic Transmission Failures (Especially 2001-2002): This is the most significant issue with the second-generation CL. The automatic transmissions in the 2001 and 2002 models were prone to failure. Look for evidence of replacement or rebuild, and factor the cost of potential repairs into your purchase decision. The 2003 model is generally considered more reliable in this regard, but still requires careful inspection.
• Potential for Oil Consumption: Some second-generation CLs experienced oil consumption issues, particularly as they aged. Regular oil level checks are crucial.
• Higher Maintenance Costs: Due to its age and complexity, the second-generation CL can be more expensive to maintain than the first generation.

Model Year Breakdown: Deeper Dive

To further clarify the best and worst years, let's examine each model year individually:

• 1997 Acura CL: The first year of production. While generally reliable, it's susceptible to early automatic transmission issues. Thoroughly inspect the transmission before purchasing.
• 1998 Acura CL: Improved over the 1997 model, but still shares the same basic design and potential transmission concerns.
• 1999 Acura CL: The final year of the first generation. Arguably the most refined of the first generation, with the 2.3L engine.
• 2001 Acura CL: The first year of the second generation, with the updated styling and powerful V6. However, it is also the most problematic in terms of automatic transmission failures. Proceed with extreme caution.
• 2002 Acura CL: Similar to the 2001 model, the 2002 CL suffers from a high rate of automatic transmission failures. Again, thorough inspection and a history of transmission maintenance are essential.
• 2003 Acura CL: The final year of production. While still potentially susceptible to transmission issues, the 2003 model is generally considered the most reliable of the second generation. It's the best choice if you're set on owning a second-generation CL.

Factors to Consider When Buying an Acura CL

Beyond the model year, several other factors should influence your decision:

• Maintenance History: A well-maintained Acura CL, regardless of the model year, is more likely to be reliable. Look for service records and evidence of regular maintenance.
• Mileage: Lower mileage is generally better, but a car with higher mileage that has been properly maintained can be a better choice than a low-mileage example that has been neglected.
• Condition: Carefully inspect the car for any signs of damage, rust, or wear and tear. Pay close attention to the interior, as worn seats and trim can indicate heavy use.
• Test Drive: A thorough test drive is essential to assess the car's overall condition and identify any potential problems. Pay attention to the transmission's shifting behavior, engine performance, and braking.
• Pre-Purchase Inspection: Consider having a mechanic inspect the car before you buy it. This can help you identify any hidden problems and avoid costly repairs down the road.

Type-S Model: Worth the Risk?

The Acura CL Type-S, available in the second generation (2001-2003), is the performance-oriented version of the CL. It features a more powerful 3.2L V6 engine, sport-tuned suspension, and other performance upgrades. While the Type-S offers a more engaging driving experience, it also shares the same potential weaknesses as the standard CL, including the automatic transmission issues.

Here's a breakdown of whether the Type-S is worth the risk:

• If you prioritize performance: The Type-S is the clear choice. Its powerful engine and sporty handling make it a fun car to drive.
• If you prioritize reliability: The standard CL (especially the first generation) is a safer bet. The Type-S's added performance comes at the cost of potentially higher maintenance and repair costs.
• If you're willing to do your homework: If you're set on owning a Type-S, be prepared to do your research and thoroughly inspect the car before you buy it. Look for evidence of transmission replacement or rebuild, and factor the cost of potential repairs into your budget.

Manual Transmission: A Solution to the Automatic Transmission Woes?

The second-generation Acura CL was also available with a 6-speed manual transmission. This is a highly desirable option, as it eliminates the automatic transmission issues that plagued the model. If you're looking for a second-generation CL, a manual transmission model is the best way to ensure reliability. They are harder to find, but the increased peace of mind is well worth the effort.

Frequently Asked Questions

• Which Acura CL year is the most reliable? The 1999 Acura CL is generally considered the most reliable due to its refined design and fewer reported issues compared to earlier models. The 2003 model is the most reliable of the second generation.

• Are Acura CLs expensive to maintain? Maintenance costs can vary depending on the model year and condition. Second-generation CLs, especially the Type-S, may have higher maintenance costs due to their age and complexity.

• What is the biggest problem with the Acura CL? The most significant problem with the second-generation Acura CL (2001-2002) is the high rate of automatic transmission failures.

• Is the Acura CL Type-S worth buying? The Type-S offers enhanced performance, but it also shares the potential for automatic transmission problems. If you prioritize performance and are willing to do thorough research, it can be a worthwhile purchase.

• Should I buy an Acura CL with a manual transmission? If you can find one, an Acura CL with a manual transmission (available in the second generation) is highly recommended. It eliminates the automatic transmission issues and provides a more engaging driving experience.

Conclusion

Choosing the best year for an Acura CL depends on your priorities and budget. The first-generation models (1997-1999) offer reliable transportation at an affordable price, while the second-generation models (2001-2003) provide more modern styling and performance, but come with the risk of automatic transmission issues. Thorough research, a careful inspection, and a pre-purchase inspection are essential to ensure you find a dependable and enjoyable Acura CL.